17 Comments
User's avatar
Geoffrey Kolbe's avatar

"the FSB, for all its violent faults, is much better known for suppressing radical nationalists than for running them."

I recall an inhabiter of the Dark Web telling me of a "honey pot" website where criminals, terrorists and those generally who thought living within the law was too constraining would meet. The website facilitated deals, set up introductions and was a place where those of common interests could exchange information. It was run by MI5. They were not interested in what the criminals were upto or planning - they were after the terrorists, potential or otherwise.

That the FSB should be engaged in a similar activity should also (I would suggest) be no surprise.

Expand full comment
PítCast's avatar

Good to have you back!

Expand full comment
Laura's avatar

I am glad you are back! Those are jaw-dropping quotes from the reports, although not surprising. They don't bode well for a democratic/open Russia anytime soon, and I cannot imagine how the world will survive these blind nationalist behemoths—both Russia and MAGA's United States. The quotes really illustrate how these strongmen and their supporters admire, learn from, and play off each other worldwide. I appreciate this analysis and these resources, thank you.

Expand full comment
SueD's avatar

Great update thank you. So glad I found your tldr newsletter way back at the start of the full scale invasion. Survey completed.

Expand full comment
Manqueman's avatar

Query: There seems to be what seems to be significant mockery of Trump in Russian media. What’s that about?

I think the Putin/Trump dynamic boils down to Trump really, really, really wanting a Trump property in Moscow and will do anything to get Putin’s approval for that — which obviously can’t realistically happen while Trump’s in office. So I suppose however much Trump’s mocked in Russian media, it doesn’t really matter. IIRC, the mockery may be in the context of building up Putin and Russian national pride.

Expand full comment
Peter Mott's avatar

Only paid subscribers can submit the survey, I thihk

Expand full comment
Sam Greene's avatar

That's not the way it's supposed to be -- especially because the newsletter is entirely free! Let me see if I can fix that.

Expand full comment
Vernon holgate's avatar

It worked straight of X. Or appeared to. Subsequent to submission l then read this. A perfect example of why l think it’s a worthy contribution to Russian studies. I was aware of the conference but not the competing political paper. Nor any idea what they signalled. The ‘after Putin’ issue is clearly very and increasingly relevant as the old doddering dinosaur locked in 1989, approaches his mortal fate. My guess is that this will trigger a massive internalised bun fight between competing groups based on self interest preservation or its corollary, advancement. This post therefore offered insight into that and the inherent tensions without churlish predictions. So well worth the read with my glass of French rose. Thanks

Expand full comment
Peter Mott's avatar

Great - problem was the submit button was permanently greyed out. But it works now.

Expand full comment
Eric Perlberg's avatar

Not working for me, it’s still grayed out

Expand full comment
Di trower's avatar

I was able to do it. As much as I'd like to become a paid subscriber, I'm not, due to the fact I live on a pension. But when & if I can, I certainly will.

Expand full comment
Laura's avatar
3dEdited

This Substack is free. No payment required or even allowed.

Expand full comment
John Heathershaw's avatar

UuiguiguxgsuYizd

Expand full comment
Sam Greene's avatar

Indeed!

Expand full comment
John Heathershaw's avatar

I'm not sure how that happened!

Expand full comment
Di trower's avatar

Never mind - it gave me a much needed laugh.

Happens to me sometimes too.

Expand full comment
Di trower's avatar

Ha ha! :)

Expand full comment